Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK)

From: Antoine Leca (Antoine.Leca@renault.fr)
Date: Thu Jan 25 2001 - 07:43:16 EST


Erik Garre's wrote:
>
> --- In unicode@egroups.com, Michael Everson <everson@e...> wrote:
>
> >There is no reason the Chinese or anyone else cannot write this [chemical
> >elements] with LATIN
> >CAPITAL LETTER O and SUBSCRIPT TWO.
>
> If this is true, why was aproved the U+338E?

Because it existed as a single element in one of the pre-existing, widely
used, encoding standards.

As this is explained with great details in the Unicode Standard, some
characters are encoded in Unicode for round-trip compatibility rather
than for actual use. These characters can be detected by looking at
their properties: they always have a (usually compatible) decomposition.

A clue: the name of the U+33xx block is "CJK compatibility"...

Antoine



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:18 EDT