I think ISO does not specify the bidi algorithm.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Cowan [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 6:21 PM
> To: Unicode List
> Cc: Unicode List
> Subject: Re: [ OT ] ISO 10646-x and Unicode 3.0 and Hebrew ?
> Elaine Keown wrote:
> > What version of ISO 10646-x is the same as Unicode 3.0?
> ISO/IEC 10646-1:2000.
> > Are there
> > ISO updates each time that correspond to the Unicode 3.0.1 and so
> > forth?
> No. Typically the properties that are affected by changes to the
> third component of the version number don't affect the ISO
> version, which has far fewer details.
> Roughly speaking, ISO 10646 gives information about *strings*,
> whereas Unicode provides information about *text*.
> > Also, are the Hebrew sections in the corresponding ISO version the
> > same as in Unicode, e.g., is there a main Hebrew block and then an
> > "Alphabetic Presentation Forms" section with other Hebrew items?
> There is / one art || John Cowan <email@example.com>
> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
> to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
> with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:18 EDT