Unfortunately, the issue at this point is that some companies have either
already accepted it or in the process of accepting it now.
Trigeminal Software, Inc.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" <email@example.com>
To: "Unicode List" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Unicode-compatible SQL?
> Mon, 5 Feb 2001 08:20:43 -0800 (GMT-0800), Mark Davis
> > The topic came up in a UTC meeting some time ago, a "UTF-8S". The
> > motivation was for performance (having a form that reproduces the
> > binary order of UTF-16).
> This is unfair: it slows down the conversion UTF-8 <-> UTF-32.
> In both cases the speed difference is almost none, and it's a big
> portability problem. I hope that such trash will not be accepted.
> __("< Marcin Kowalczyk * email@example.com http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
> ^^ SYGNATURA ZASTĘPCZA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:18 EDT