Re: fictional scripts revisited

From: Curtis Clark (jcclark@csupomona.edu)
Date: Fri Feb 23 2001 - 00:46:37 EST

Next message: Joel Rees: "Re: fictional scripts revisited"
Previous message: Curtis Clark: "Re: What about musical notation?"
Maybe in reply to: Thomas Chan: "fictional scripts revisited"
Next in thread: Joel Rees: "Re: fictional scripts revisited"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 07:04 PM 2/22/01, Joel Rees wrote:
>I'm telling you that 17 planes is not enough, and it _will_ become a painful
>constraint in your lifetime.

So Plane 9, say, can be nothing but surrogates-of-surrogates, to some 64-
or 128-bit code space.

-- 
Curtis Clark                  http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/
Biological Sciences Department             Voice: (909) 869-4062
California State Polytechnic University      FAX: (909) 869-4078
Pomona CA 91768-4032  USA                  jcclark@csupomona.edu

Next message: Joel Rees: "Re: fictional scripts revisited"
Previous message: Curtis Clark: "Re: What about musical notation?"
Maybe in reply to: Thomas Chan: "fictional scripts revisited"
Next in thread: Joel Rees: "Re: fictional scripts revisited"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:19 EDT