Mark Davis wrote:
>> A _code_point_ is an integer value which is assigned to an abstract
>> character. Each character receives a unique code point.
> inaccurate. Multiple *abstract characters* can have a single code point;
> multiple code points can correspond to a single *abstract character*.
TUS 3.0 is vague on this, but I suppose what is meant is that if two
single characters are canonically equivalent, they constitute only one
abstract character. Does U+0041 U+0300 represent one abstract
character (the same as the abstract character represented by U+00C0)
or two consecutive abstract characters? If the former, does U+0051
U+0300 also represent an abstract character?
-- There is / one art || John Cowan <email@example.com> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:19 EDT