Re: Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (michka@trigeminal.com)
Date: Fri Feb 23 2001 - 12:10:09 EST

Next message: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now"
Previous message: Mark Davis: "Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...)"
Maybe in reply to: Dan Kolis: "Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now"
Next in thread: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Well, if you have no cultural bias and you encode Klingon, you pretty well
> have to include anything.

Last I saw, no one was going to encode Klingon.

So would the converse of that statement be true?

> Interesting discussion, however.

"Interesting" is one word for it. :-)

MichKa

Michael Kaplan
Trigeminal Software, Inc.
http://www.trigeminal.com/

Next message: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now"
Previous message: Mark Davis: "Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...)"
Maybe in reply to: Dan Kolis: "Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now"
Next in thread: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:19 EDT