Re: Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now

From: Michael Everson ([email protected])
Date: Sat Feb 24 2001 - 07:48:42 EST

Next message: [email protected]: "Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...)"
Previous message: Tom Lord: "Re: bijective (was re: An Absurdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re:"
Maybe in reply to: Dan Kolis: "Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 08:45 -0800 2001-02-23, Michael \(michka\) Kaplan wrote:
>From: "Dan Kolis" <[email protected]>
>
>> Well, if you have no cultural bias and you encode Klingon, you pretty well
>> have to include anything.
>
>Last I saw, no one was going to encode Klingon.

Oh, we've got a *proposal* for Klingon. It does not, however, appear
that it meets the criteria for use as well as Tengwar and Cirth.

-- 
Michael Everson  **  Everson Gunn Teoranta  **   http://www.egt.ie
15 Port Chaeimhghein �ochtarach; Baile �tha Cliath 2; �ire/Ireland
Mob +353 86 807 9169 ** Fax +353 1 478 2597 ** Vox +353 1 478 2597
27 P�irc an Fh�ithlinn;  Baile an Bh�thair;  Co. �tha Cliath; �ire

Next message: [email protected]: "Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...)"
Previous message: Tom Lord: "Re: bijective (was re: An Absurdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re:"
Maybe in reply to: Dan Kolis: "Fictional scripts revisited, might as well relax about it now"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:19 EDT