Re: UTF-8 <> UCS-2/UTF-16 conversion for library use

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (michka@trigeminal.com)
Date: Mon Sep 24 2001 - 15:32:41 EDT

Previous message: Carl W. Brown: "RE: Position of 1 and 0"
In reply to: Ayers, Mike: "RE: UTF-8 <> UCS-2/UTF-16 conversion for library use"
Next in thread: Carl W. Brown: "RE: UTF-8 <> UCS-2/UTF-16 conversion for library use"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: "Ayers, Mike" <Mike_Ayers@bmc.com>

> Analyze problem. Pick solution. In that order.

Wiser advise was ne'er spoken, on *this* topic at least.

I wonder is there is some way that a policy decision can be made to declare
a moratorium on the whole "*My* UTF is better than *your* UTF" for a while?
It is getting tiring.

MichKa

Michael Kaplan
Trigeminal Software, Inc.
http://www.trigeminal.com/

Previous message: Carl W. Brown: "RE: Position of 1 and 0"
In reply to: Ayers, Mike: "RE: UTF-8 <> UCS-2/UTF-16 conversion for library use"
Next in thread: Carl W. Brown: "RE: UTF-8 <> UCS-2/UTF-16 conversion for library use"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Sep 24 2001 - 14:31:59 EDT