On Wednesday, June 5, 2002, at 07:27 AM, Adam Twardoch wrote:
> Oh, thank you! I needed that figure to make a point why you cannot make a
> single TrueType font covering all of the Unicode range. I knew it was way
> more than 65,536, but it's better to quote a precise figure :)
Ah, but the figure Ken give you isn't enough, anyway for two reasons:
1) Some scripts (e.g., south Asian scripts) will require additional glyphs
for proper display.
2) For Han in particular, one shape does not fit all. You'll need
multiple locale-specific glyphs for a number of characters.
In real life, you can ignore (2) by simply issuing a locale-specific
version of a font, but there's no real way to get around (1).
John H. Jenkins
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jun 05 2002 - 09:11:27 EDT