On Wednesday, July 3, 2002, at 02:23 PM, Murray Sargent wrote:
> as something inappropriate. Question: how does one code up (presumably
> with markup) a caret over a jk pair in a math expression? The dot on the
> j should be missing for this case, but how does one communicate that to
> a font if there's no code for a dotless j? It seems that dotless j is
> needed for some mathematical purposes.
The glyph is; the character isn't. There are also accented j's which are
based on a dotless-j. The way we do it is include a glyph called
"dotlessj" in the font, and have the tables set up so that whenever "j" is
found with an accent, dotlessj is substituted.
John H. Jenkins
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jul 03 2002 - 15:46:18 EDT