RE: Terminus ad quem for non-revivalist Ogham and Runic

• Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Saying characters out loud (derives from hash, pound, octothorpe?)"
• Maybe in reply to: John Cowan: "Terminus ad quem for non-revivalist Ogham and Runic"
• Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Terminus ad quem for non-revivalist Ogham and Runic"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michael Everson wrote:
> At 21:52 -0400 2002-07-04, John Cowan wrote:
> >The Unicode Standard (version 3.0, chapter 7) claims that Ogham and
> >Runic were still in non-revivalist use to the 16th and 19th centuries
> >respectively. Does anyone know where the evidence for these
> statements
> >was found?
>
> I do.

:-)

And would you be so kind to tell us where? (If the answer to this question
is "I would", please proceed directly with the reference).

_ Marco

• Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Saying characters out loud (derives from hash, pound, octothorpe?)"
• Maybe in reply to: John Cowan: "Terminus ad quem for non-revivalist Ogham and Runic"
• Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Terminus ad quem for non-revivalist Ogham and Runic"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 05 2002 - 05:48:27 EDT