Michael Everson wrote:
> At 21:52 -0400 2002-07-04, John Cowan wrote:
> >The Unicode Standard (version 3.0, chapter 7) claims that Ogham and
> >Runic were still in non-revivalist use to the 16th and 19th centuries
> >respectively. Does anyone know where the evidence for these
> >was found?
> I do.
And would you be so kind to tell us where? (If the answer to this question
is "I would", please proceed directly with the reference).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 05 2002 - 05:48:27 EDT