> I do not feel at all comfortable continuing with this discussion, and
> would prefer to have my questions about Unicode (its staffing levels)
Discussion about staffing levels is not appropriate to this list, but
the current staff is a matter of public record:
http://www.unicode.org/unicode/consortium/directors.html
Magda Danish, Administrative Director (Mountain View, California)
Rick McGowan, Senior Software Engineer (Mountain View, California)
Julie Allen, Senior Editor (Seattle, Washington)
> and WG 2 (its timetable for 10646) answered,
This can easily be found by checking current resolutions of WG2.
Those are also a matter of public record, being open (unlocked)
SC2 documents. The latest are the resolutions from the Dublin WG2
meeting:
http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/open/02n3614.pdf
Generic access to SC2 documents via the document register is at:
http://lucia.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/servlets/ScmDoc10?Com_Id=02
The overview of SC2's program of work can be found also via
the dkuug-hosted SC2 website:
http://www.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/open/pow.htm
The next WG2 meeting is to be held jointly with SC2, in Tokyo,
December 9 - 13. At that meeting we expect that the current
amendments out for ballot as FPDAM's (Amendment 1 to 10646-2
and Amendment 2 to 10646-1) will have a resolution of comments,
be issued as DAM's, shortly thereafter to be approved and
published. The additions for Unicode 4.0 will be synchronized with
those two amendments.
> as more appropriate to this
> list.
--Ken
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 14:30:17 EDT