Re: Dublin Conference: Re: ISO/IEC 10646 versus Unicode

From: Kenneth Whistler (
Date: Tue Jul 23 2002 - 16:17:51 EDT

> I do not feel at all comfortable continuing with this discussion, and
> would prefer to have my questions about Unicode (its staffing levels)

Discussion about staffing levels is not appropriate to this list, but
the current staff is a matter of public record:

Magda Danish, Administrative Director (Mountain View, California)
Rick McGowan, Senior Software Engineer (Mountain View, California)
Julie Allen, Senior Editor (Seattle, Washington)

> and WG 2 (its timetable for 10646) answered,

This can easily be found by checking current resolutions of WG2.
Those are also a matter of public record, being open (unlocked)
SC2 documents. The latest are the resolutions from the Dublin WG2

Generic access to SC2 documents via the document register is at:

The overview of SC2's program of work can be found also via
the dkuug-hosted SC2 website:

The next WG2 meeting is to be held jointly with SC2, in Tokyo,
December 9 - 13. At that meeting we expect that the current
amendments out for ballot as FPDAM's (Amendment 1 to 10646-2
and Amendment 2 to 10646-1) will have a resolution of comments,
be issued as DAM's, shortly thereafter to be approved and
published. The additions for Unicode 4.0 will be synchronized with
those two amendments.

> as more appropriate to this
> list.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 14:30:17 EDT