Re: Dublin Conference: Re: ISO/IEC 10646 versus Unicode

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Wed Jul 24 2002 - 08:34:54 EDT

At 12:25 +0100 2002-07-24, Marion Gunn said:

>I know ISO/IEC 10646 can not be made any exception to ISO rules
>which demand a review every 5 years,

ISO/IEC 10646 won't need a formal 5-year review, because it has been
under constant development.

>and I would like to know what stage it is at now, or what the main
>elements driving/preventing WG 2 progess on that may be.

The main element driving the addition of characters and scripts to
the standard is ME. :-)

Michael Everson *** Everson Typography ***

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jul 24 2002 - 06:53:46 EDT