Re: The standard disclaimer

From: John Hudson (tiro@tiro.com)
Date: Wed Jul 24 2002 - 13:33:27 EDT


At 08:41 AM 24-07-02, john.colby@btinternet.com wrote:

> > from: Doug Ewell <dewell@adelphia.net>
> > subject: Re: The standard disclaimer
> >
> > James Kass <jameskass at worldnet dot att dot net> wrote:
> >
> > >> .... However, just as
> > >> no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding)
> > >
> > > What about Gummo? (Or,... Karl? or... Deutsche ?)
> >
> > Stretch?
> >
>Skid??

Combining?

(Ha! I'm even on topic!)

John Hudson

Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com
Vancouver, BC tiro@tiro.com

Language must belong to the Other -- to my linguistic community
as a whole -- before it can belong to me, so that the self comes to its
unique articulation in a medium which is always at some level
indifferent to it. - Terry Eagleton



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jul 24 2002 - 11:44:15 EDT