Re: "Missing character" glyph

Date: Fri Aug 02 2002 - 02:05:59 EDT

On 08/02/2002 12:19:20 AM "James Kass" wrote:

>Now I get it. Still think Kenneth Whistler's suggestions for covering
>all kinds of display problems would be better than encoding a new
>character for this limited purpose, though.

It's about as useful as the control pictures (2400..2426 -- which is where
I might be inclined to put this thing), which is not a lot, but potentially
of good use, and at one single character is not all that costly (what else
are we going to put at 2427..242F?)

- Peter

Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <>

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Aug 02 2002 - 00:23:44 EDT