"John H. Jenkins" wrote:
>
> Of course, using the taboo variant selector is about as vague as an
> IDC, so it doesn't make that much difference.
>
Actually, on second thoughts, why do we need a taboo variant selector when we already have generic
variation selectors (U+FE00 through U+FE0F) ? The Standardized Variants document
<http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/StandardizedVariants.html> states :
<quote>
Han Variants
At this time no Han variants exist. When they do, a table will be inserted here.
</quote>
Surely if there ever was a place to put taboo-form variants, this is it.
Andrew C. West
<http://uk.geocities.com/babelstone1357/>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Aug 09 2002 - 12:00:41 EDT