Re: RE: Furigana

Date: Fri Aug 16 2002 - 04:38:38 EDT

On 08/14/2002 01:16:29 AM starner wrote:

>That seems to be basically what William Overington is proposing,
>except these characters only handle furigana, instead all markup.

Not quite. WO has proposed characters to be used in interchange. These are
only intended for internal use by programmers. They are exactly like the
non-characters at FDD0..FDEF except that these were named to a specific
function (as was FFFC -- also an internal-use code with a
specifically-named function).

- Peter

Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <>

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Aug 16 2002 - 02:46:24 EDT