From: John Hudson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Oct 28 2002 - 15:36:08 EST
>On 2002.10.28, 13:09, David Starner <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Basically, any decorative or handwriting font can't be a Unicode font.
> > Seems pointless to tell a lot of the fontmakers out there that they
> > shouldn't worry about Unicode, because Unicode's only for standard
> > book fonts
Hello? Who says decorative or handwriting fonts can't be Unicode fonts?
I've got dozens of fonts on my system that prove this wrong. Zapfino, which
ships with OS X and which I had the privilege to work on, is about as
decorative a handwriting font as you could wish for, and of course it has a
Or are you working with some definition of 'Unicode font' other than 'font
with a Unicode cmap'?
Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com
Vancouver, BC firstname.lastname@example.org
It is necessary that by all means and cunning,
the cursed owners of books should be persuaded
to make them available to us, either by argument
or by force. - Michael Apostolis, 1467
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Oct 28 2002 - 17:24:54 EST