Re: Character identities

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Mon Oct 28 2002 - 16:36:34 EST

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Character identities"

    At 20:59 +0000 2002-10-28, Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin wrote:
    >On 2002.10.28, 13:09, David Starner <starner@okstate.edu> wrote:
    >
    >> Basically, any decorative or handwriting font can't be a Unicode font.
    ><...>
    >> Seems pointless to tell a lot of the fontmakers out there that they
    >> shouldn't worry about Unicode, because Unicode's only for standard
    >> book fonts
    >
    >Hm, what if I want to make, say, snow capped Devanagari glyphs for my
    >hiking company in Nepal? Shouldn't I assign them to Unicode code points?

    That's what Private Use code positions are for.

    -- 
    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Oct 28 2002 - 17:39:49 EST