From: David Starner (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Oct 28 2002 - 17:39:40 EST
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 09:36:34PM +0000, Michael Everson wrote:
> At 20:59 +0000 2002-10-28, Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin wrote:
> >On 2002.10.28, 13:09, David Starner <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >> Basically, any decorative or handwriting font can't be a Unicode font.
> >> Seems pointless to tell a lot of the fontmakers out there that they
> >> shouldn't worry about Unicode, because Unicode's only for standard
> >> book fonts
> >Hm, what if I want to make, say, snow capped Devanagari glyphs for my
> >hiking company in Nepal? Shouldn't I assign them to Unicode code points?
> That's what Private Use code positions are for.
But think of the utility if Unicode added a COMBINING SNOWCAP and
COMBINING FIRECAP! But should we combine the SNOWCAP with the ICECAP?
-- David Starner - email@example.com Great is the battle-god, great, and his kingdom-- A field where a thousand corpses lie. -- Stephen Crane, "War is Kind"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Oct 28 2002 - 18:21:15 EST