Date: Tue Oct 29 2002 - 16:56:16 EST
>At 21:07 +0100 2002-10-29, Marco Cimarosti wrote:
>> > I'm sure Michael would agree too (at least I hope so), and many others.
>>There are many Michaels and many "others" here... If any of them wish to
>>intervene, I hope they'll rather say something new to take the discussion
>>out of the loop, rather than joining one faction.
>My eyes have glazed over reading this discussion. What am I being
>asked to agree with?
Is it complaint with Unicode to have a font where a-umlaut has a glyph of
a with e above? What about a glyph of a-macron (e.g. a handwriting font for someone who writes a-umlaut that way)?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 29 2002 - 17:50:26 EST