From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Nov 02 2002 - 13:29:45 EST
From: "Joseph Boyle" <Boyle@siebel.com>
> These are listed as examples to demonstrate the idea of a configuration
> listing encoding constraints. The fact that each constraint is arguable is
> good reason to make the constraints configurable, and therefore to have
> names to distinguish BOM and non-BOM UTF-8.
Yes, but the fact that every one of them can have it or not and only
inadequate parsers will ever really have a problem with them is a good
indication that it is not really required for the users who care about
separate charset names....
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 13:59:29 EST