Re: Speaking of Plane 1 characters...

• Previous message: Markus Scherer: "Re: Speaking of Plane 1 characters..."
• Maybe in reply to: John Hudson: "Speaking of Plane 1 characters..."
• Next in thread: Dominikus Scherkl: "RE: Speaking of Plane 1 characters..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michael Kaplan wrote,

> Glad you like it, John -- I am sure James Kass remembers when I put it up,

Indeed.

John Cowan wrote,

> The Right Thing in HTML terms is to say #&x10312; and *not* use the
> surrogate pair representation.

How about 𐌒 (or xF0,x90,x8C,x92) ?

Tex Texin wrote,

> Hmmm. I just reviewed Andrew's comment that he can get support for
> surrogates via uniscribe on windows 9x.
> I guess I have to think about extending this to include those systems. I
> guess if I get confirmation (or disconfirmation) from John or other
> Microsofties I will update the page accordingly.

Got non-BMP working here on MSIE 5.0 on Win 98. Had to fix the Registry
per the note on:

(all on one line:)
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-
us/intl/unicode_192r.asp

Best regards,

James Kass.

• Next message: Baiju M: "Re: Malayalam Half-U: how"
• Previous message: Markus Scherer: "Re: Speaking of Plane 1 characters..."
• Maybe in reply to: John Hudson: "Speaking of Plane 1 characters..."
• Next in thread: Dominikus Scherkl: "RE: Speaking of Plane 1 characters..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 11 2002 - 23:08:32 EST