Re: Script of U+0951 .. U+0954

From: John Cowan (
Date: Thu Dec 05 2002 - 20:32:12 EST

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Script of U+0951 .. U+0954"

    Mark Davis scripsit:

    > That is incorrect; all non-spacing marks should inherit the script of their
    > base character. We need to make this clear in
    > for Unicode 4.0

    But don't we also say somewhere that weird collocations like Q with nukta,
    alif with circumflex, and teh with DEVANAGARI VOWEL SIGN I don't have
    to "work" properly?

    John Cowan <>
    I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,
    han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 05 2002 - 21:20:40 EST