RE: Precomposed Tibetan

From: Marco Cimarosti (marco.cimarosti@essetre.it)
Date: Thu Dec 19 2002 - 04:21:29 EST

Next message: Andrew C. West: "Re: Precomposed Tibetan"

Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Ain"
Maybe in reply to: Andrew C. West: "Precomposed Tibetan"
Next in thread: Andrew C. West: "Re: Precomposed Tibetan"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Thomas Chan wrote:
> [...] We don't necessarily want to be making
> vendor/legacy/font-based to unicode mapping tables for every potential
> vendor, do we?

No, of course -- unless that is seen as a necessary counter-move to block a
proposal that would crash the architecture of a script's encoding. :-)

_ Marco

Next message: Andrew C. West: "Re: Precomposed Tibetan"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Ain"
Maybe in reply to: Andrew C. West: "Precomposed Tibetan"
Next in thread: Andrew C. West: "Re: Precomposed Tibetan"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 19 2002 - 05:18:37 EST