Re: Ain

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Thu Dec 19 2002 - 23:57:13 EST

Next message: Lisa Moore: "23rd Internationalization and Unicode Conference - March 2003 - Prague, Czech Republic"

Previous message: David J. Perry: "RE: h in Greek epigraphy"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Ain"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michael Everson <everson at evertype dot com> wrote:

>> If U+1D25 is to be LATIN LETTER AIN -- not CAPITAL or SMALL -- then
>> a more consistent name for U+1D5C would be MODIFIER LETTER AIN.
>
> You should have made that comment through your L2 before the last
> ballot closed. It is too late to change this. Sorry.

Oh well, I only noticed it 24 hours ago (and apparently nobody else
noticed it at all). In any case, it's hardly a critical error -- the
name isn't strictly wrong, or particularly confusing.

-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California

Next message: Lisa Moore: "23rd Internationalization and Unicode Conference - March 2003 - Prague, Czech Republic"
Previous message: David J. Perry: "RE: h in Greek epigraphy"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Ain"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Dec 20 2002 - 00:33:02 EST