Re: Status of Unihan Mandarin readings?

From: Raymond Mercier (RaymondM@compuserve.com)
Date: Fri Dec 20 2002 - 04:50:16 EST

  • Next message: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Status of Unihan Mandarin readings?"

    On the errors in kMandarin:

    Apart from the kMandarin errors of the kind that Andrew West has noted,
    there is another corruption, namely the loss of ü, and this happened
    between "3.0b1" and "3.0b2", when the ü became the two bytes C393.

    As to Han/Yi, "U+6C49 YI4 HAN4" is found not only in "3.0b1" and "3.0b2",
    but also in "2.0". The HAN4 was dropped only in 3.2.
    While I admire the effort to "explain" the intrusion of YI4, I feel it is a
    bit misplaced, and that some more mechanical/clerical explanation is in
    order. After all, look at the number of times "same as U+.... " is written
    as "sama as U+... " in 3.2: 6 to be precise.

    Raymond Mercier

    Raymond Mercier



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Dec 20 2002 - 05:34:57 EST