Re: Status of Unihan Mandarin readings?

From: John H. Jenkins (
Date: Fri Dec 20 2002 - 10:44:28 EST

  • Next message: Raymond Mercier: "Re: Status of Unihan Mandarin readings?"

    On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 02:50 AM, Raymond Mercier wrote:

    > Apart from the kMandarin errors of the kind that Andrew West has
    > noted, there is another corruption, namely the loss of , and this
    > happened between "3.0b1" and "3.0b2", when the became the two bytes
    > C393.

    That's because the file was converted to UTF-8. Previously it had not
    been in any single encoding, which was creating problems.

    John H. Jenkins

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Dec 20 2002 - 11:28:24 EST