Re: Coptic II?

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (
Date: Thu Dec 26 2002 - 17:00:21 EST

  • Next message: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin: "Re: Coptic II?"

    From: "Michael Everson" <>

    > The Georgian has to do with a false unification (whatever the reasons
    > for it, it was a mistake).

    In the opinion of some people.

    Others, such as the head of the automation dept. of the National
    Parlimentary Library of Georgia, do not agree with this assessment. As the
    opinion from the library is based on a careful look at their nearly 4
    million Georgian books they need to catalog and handle, I cannot help
    feeling that there may be some merit to their point of view?

    MichKa [MS]

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 26 2002 - 17:39:50 EST