Possible error in example in UTR10: Collation

From: Vadim Godunko (vgodunko@rost.ru)
Date: Fri Jan 10 2003 - 09:57:02 EST

  • Next message: Andy White: "RE: Bengali question"

    Hello,

    Step 3 of computing collation elements for compatibility decompositions say:

    Set the first two L3 values to be lookup(L3) ... Set the remaining L3
    values to MAX ...:

    0028 [*023D.0020.0004] % LEFT PARENTHESIS
    0032 [.06C8.0020.001F] % DIGIT TWO
    0029 [*023E.0020.001F] % RIGHT PARENTHESIS

    May be:
    0028 [*023D.0020.0004] % LEFT PARENTHESIS
    0032 [.06C8.0020.0004] % DIGIT TWO
    0029 [*023E.0020.001F] % RIGHT PARENTHESIS

    Step 4:

    Concatenate the result to procedure the sequence of collation elements
    that the character maps to.

    2475 [*023D.0020.0004] [.06C8.0020.0004] [*023E.0020.0004]

    May be:

    2475 [*023D.0020.0004] [.06C8.0020.0004] [*023E.0020.001F]

    Vadim Godunko



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 10 2003 - 10:54:53 EST