Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'

From: Werner LEMBERG (
Date: Wed Feb 19 2003 - 18:13:05 EST

  • Next message: John H. Jenkins: "Re: [OpenType] PS glyph `phi' vs `phi1'"

    > Thanks. As a conclusion it seems that both Adobe's mapping of
    > U+03D5 and U+03C6 to glyph names and the Unicode annotation for
    > U+03D5 is incorrect (in case backwards compatibility is of
    > importance).
    > The right mapping should be
    > phi 03D5
    > phi1 03C6

    I have to correct myself, fortunately. After looking into the printed
    version of Unicode 2.0 I see that the glyphs of 03D5 and 03C6 in the
    file U0370.pdf are exchanged. Your assuption is correct that the
    annotation in Unicode 3.2 is wrong.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 19 2003 - 19:10:45 EST