RFC2279bis (was RE: Unicode 4.0 BETA available for review)

From: Francois Yergeau (FYergeau@alis.com)
Date: Thu Feb 27 2003 - 16:29:16 EST

  • Next message: Yung-Fong Tang: "quoted-string in for MIME Content-Type charset parameter"

    ftang@netscape.com wrote:
    > 1. the definitation in Unicode itself (3.0, 3.1)
    > 2. the RFC which summarize it.
    > I am sure you can control the point 1. But we have to understand the
    > point 2 is also important. The reasone people refer to point 2 is
    > usually the RFC is much shorter and focus than the Unicode standard
    > itself. And also RFC is FREE of charge but not Unicode
    > standard itself.

    Consequently, it would be nice if anyone with an interest in the matter
    would carefully review the internet-draft that is meant to replace RFC 2279
    very soon:


    The proper list for discussing this draft is ietf-charsets@w3.org, see
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ for archives and subscription info.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 27 2003 - 17:10:36 EST