From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Mar 07 2003 - 09:48:47 EST
At 15:36 +0100 2003-03-07, Pim Blokland wrote:
>Kent Karlsson schreef:
>> Typographically, it's a ligature either way.
>You mean that both ae and ij should be called ligatures, although one is
>fused and the other isn't?
>OK, I can live with that. I'd rather the ij were called a digraph, though.
These terms are not normative. Get used to it.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 10:32:59 EST