From: John Hudson (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Apr 02 2003 - 01:27:08 EST
At 09:07 PM 4/1/2003, Peter_Constable@sil.org wrote:
>On a few occasions in the past there has been discussion of typeforms
>involving a base character modified by some appendage that is connected,
>and it has been commented that generally it is preferable for these to be
>encoded as atomic characters rather than as base + combining mark
I can't see any advantage to such atomic encoding in a modern text
processing environment with smart font support. It is easy enough to map
e.g. b + palatal hook to a ligature using a glyph composition feature.
Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com
Vancouver, BC firstname.lastname@example.org
Alone among the news networks, Jazeera gives
you the impression there is a war going on,
rather than a series of press conferences.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 02 2003 - 02:02:53 EST