From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Apr 03 2003 - 11:14:03 EST
At 09:28 -0600 2003-04-03, Peter_Constable@sil.org wrote:
>Michael Everson wrote on 04/03/2003 07:34:53 AM:
>> Peter, I often suggest this, and you rarely take me up on it
>I take you up on it when it suits what I need to do.
Well if you want people to give accurate advice based on analysis of
actual glyph forms you need to make the information available to them.
And I mean L2/WG2 documents in PDF format, not a web-page with gifs
that take forever to load. I was unable to review your
tresillo/cuatrillo document for this reason.
> > What "a bunch of base-ogonek characters" could mean is a mystery to me.
>A bunch of ogonek-modified characters: a-ogonek, c-ogonek, e-ogonek,
I've gone back and reread your original post and I still don't have
enough information to have an opinion. Sorry if it doesn't suit you
to publish a paper on this topic.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 03 2003 - 12:00:09 EST