Re: ogonek vs. retroflex hook

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Thu Apr 03 2003 - 11:14:03 EST

  • Next message: Marco Cimarosti: "[OT] How do you say "PEACE"?"

    At 09:28 -0600 2003-04-03, wrote:
    >Michael Everson wrote on 04/03/2003 07:34:53 AM:
    >> Peter, I often suggest this, and you rarely take me up on it
    >I take you up on it when it suits what I need to do.

    Well if you want people to give accurate advice based on analysis of
    actual glyph forms you need to make the information available to them.

    And I mean L2/WG2 documents in PDF format, not a web-page with gifs
    that take forever to load. I was unable to review your
    tresillo/cuatrillo document for this reason.

    > > What "a bunch of base-ogonek characters" could mean is a mystery to me.
    >A bunch of ogonek-modified characters: a-ogonek, c-ogonek, e-ogonek,
    >schwa-ogonek, etc.

    I've gone back and reread your original post and I still don't have
    enough information to have an opinion. Sorry if it doesn't suit you
    to publish a paper on this topic.

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 03 2003 - 12:00:09 EST