From: Edward C. D. Hopkins (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Apr 10 2003 - 13:02:44 EDT
Jim, this explains the history and I'll just have to adapt to the Greek
codepoints that have been created. Thanks for taking the time to explain.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Allan" <email@example.com>
> There is a gripe (incorrect) about Unicode's failure to recognize either
> uppercase or lowercase lunate sigma here:
> There is an explanation of uses of lunate and non-lunate sigma and doubt
> whether Unicode should or should not recognize both at
> http://omega.enstb.org/yannis/pdf/boston99.pdf. Search for "lunate".
> For the actual proposal request for capital lunate sigma see
> http://www.tlg.uci.edu/final/lunate which gives the original proposal
> requesting capital lunate sigma.
> In short, there was enough desire and "need" for both forms that Unicode
> now provides them.
> People may use either or both as desired.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 10 2003 - 13:54:26 EDT