From: Mark Davis (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Apr 22 2003 - 10:21:32 EDT
I'll pass the "bumping up" problem on to the right person. I don't know if
there is room yet to change the final charts, but at least it'll be on the
books for the next time.
(مرقص بن داود)
IBM, MS 50-2/B11, 5600 Cottle Rd, SJ CA 95193
fax: (408) 256-0799
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jungshik Shin" <email@example.com>
To: "Mark Davis" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: "Kenneth Whistler" <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 21:00
Subject: Re: alternative names for letterlike symbols(was..Re: Release of
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Mark Davis wrote:
> > From: "Jungshik Shin" <email@example.com>
> > > On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
> > > > Jungshik asked:
> > > > > can they be subjected to change? Sometimes it's not machine
> > > > > data but the text of the book that needs some feedback.
> > > > From the point of view of feedback and review they are final.
> > >
> > > OK. I see, but I wish they were not because we haven't had a chance
> > > to directly review them (other than those in UTRs for which we had
> > > ample time to review and give feedbak)
> > You *did* get a chance. All of the sections that you reference are in
> > nameslist, which was available in the beta of the Unicode Character
> > for quite a while.
> > http://www.unicode.org/Public/4.0-Update/NamesList-4.0.0.txt
> I was tempted to add 'machine readable data' after 'other
> than.....) here again. I should have done that although that wouldn't
> have rendered any less of a prime 'sin' my mistake of not realizing
> that alternative names are in NamesList file that had been available
> for feedback. I don't know how I forgot that there is NamesList.
> Anyway, I found that Devanagari Vowel Sign AA is now correctly
> placed in 'Dependent vowel signs' subblock.
> Except for one :-) I believe the following issue genuinely falls to the
> category of copy-editing(or whatever is left of TUS 4.0 book publishing
> procedure). It's about typesetting (not the content.) Why don't you
> take a look at http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0B80.pdf to see what
> I meant?
> > > In addition, in the annotation (canonical decomposition) for
> > > U+0BCA, U+0BCB, and U+0BCC glyphs for U+0BC6, U+0BC7 and U+0BC6 (the
> > > left part of two part vowel signs) in the chart for Tamil kinda bump
> > > upon(overlap) the last digits to the left (6, 7, and 6) making them
> > > to recognize.
> Anyway, I'll make sure that I'll report other problems during 4.1 (or
> whatever next version) beta period.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 22 2003 - 11:03:24 EDT