From: Jane Liu (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Apr 25 2003 - 15:48:06 EDT
Thanks for your quick response.
Do you know by any chance that the upcoming Windows 2003/Windows .NET
would have the capability to handle Unicode normalization?
To answer your question, basically right now if I write the file name
by using normalized U+F019 which would be U+795E, I won't be able to
find it and reopen it any more ...
--- "Michael (michka) Kaplan" <email@example.com> wrote:
> From: "Jane Liu" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > 1. Why Windows doesn't do normalization,
> Windows predates normalization.
> > and is there any ways to ask Windows to do it?
> Not currently, no.
> > 2. If Windows never do normalization,
> Never say never, though. It is hard to say what will happen here,
> in the
> future. Though since the input methods that ship with the OS shape
> the type
> of text that is produced, it is not going to be common for people
> to find
> "multiple ways to skin the cat".
> > how should I balance this in my
> > Windows based application since I am using the ICU.
> Well, see above. You can certainly do the additional processing if
> you like.
> > I don't think
> > simply turn off the normalization process in the ICU would be a
> > idea though, however, if I keep to use ICU to normalize
> everything in
> > my application, then I will possible run into some troubles when
> > dealing with the Windows system ...
> How is that trouble, precisely? Could you explain this a bit more
> MichKa [MS]
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 25 2003 - 16:30:42 EDT