Re: Dutch IJ character

From: Doug Ewell (
Date: Mon Apr 28 2003 - 18:05:35 EDT

  • Next message: Rick Cameron: "RE: Dutch IJ character"

    Thomas Milo <t dot milo at chello dot nl> wrote:

    > What I did ask for is a Dutch-International kbd with all the features
    > of the US-International one, but tailored for Dutch by the addition of
    > ,C > c-cedilla and I+J > IJ using the same dead key mechanism.

    The US-International keyboard already has a way to enter Ç
    (Shift+AltGr+,) and ç (AltGr+,). Those AltGr keys really aren't that
    bad. You get used to them, and they don't have the drawback that normal
    sequences can no longer be typed without an intervening space.

    A dead-key sequence where "," (comma) is the first character sounds
    difficult to use. Since most commas in ordinary text are followed by a
    space, the typist would have to type TWO spaces after the comma much of
    the time to avoid accidental composition. Likewise, "I" as a dead key
    would cause an annoying delay after every "I" is typed. And asking the
    major vendors to completely overhaul the standard dead-key mechanism to
    use backspace-and-replace seems like, as Thomas might say, a

    BTW, this thread marks the first time I've ever heard that Ç/ç is used
    in Dutch. Michael Everson doesn't list it in his "Alphabets of Europe."

    > Here in the NL popular publications advise Dutch users to avoid using
    > the Dutch kbd, and to select Locale= Dutch and KBD=US-International
    > instead to avoid the hardware mismatch (real or imaginary) associated
    > with the Dutch Kbd.

    You mean that because the Dutch use American hardware, the standard
    Dutch keyboard driver (which has an @-sign on key E00 and a slash on key
    E11) doesn't match the keycaps? Fine, then there's nothing wrong with
    the idea of creating a new Dutch national keyboard layout.

    I'd still like to know what key on Dutch typewriters was assigned to the
    IJ digraph. If the answer is "none, they just type I and J," then
    everything can still be accomplished in the computer age without the
    precomposed digraph.

    > I am not fully convinced IJ should be treated as digraph. The glitch
    > is that it capitalizes as a whole, and that older users try to emulate
    > it with Y. And, it cannot be broken apart so that ICE CREAM on a
    > corner shop is
    > IJ
    > S
    > never
    > I
    > J
    > S
    > And, the telephone directories put IJ and Y in the same sorting
    > position.

    All of this can be accomplished with appropriate locale-dependent
    settings instead of character encoding. (Sorry for using the L word.)

    -Doug Ewell
     Fullerton, California

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 28 2003 - 19:00:55 EDT