Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp"

From: Otto Stolz (Otto.Stolz@uni-konstanz.de)
Date: Thu May 08 2003 - 04:25:15 EDT

Next message: Theodore H. Smith: "Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""

Previous message: Kevin Brown: "Re: Quest text font now available"
In reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
Next in thread: Ben Dougall: "Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Kenneth Whistler wrote:

> The place to look, now that the Conformance chapter for Unicode
> 4.0 has been posted, is:
> http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode4.0.0/ch03.pdf

Cheers,
OS

Next message: Theodore H. Smith: "Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
Previous message: Kevin Brown: "Re: Quest text font now available"
In reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
Next in thread: Ben Dougall: "Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 08 2003 - 05:16:15 EDT