Re: visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters

From: jameskass@att.net
Date: Mon May 12 2003 - 16:44:14 EDT

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: U+3031 and on"

Previous message: Mark Davis: "Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm"
Maybe in reply to: Jungshik Shin: "visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters"
Next in thread: Andrew C. West: "Re: visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

.
Jungshik Shin wrote,

> At that time, I hadn't checked it out yet. Now that I've checked it,
> it turned out that it's Code2000. It appears that James may have been a
> bit too aggressie to put visible glyphs for U+2062(⁢ : INVISIBLE TIMES)
> and a few other invisible math operators around U+2062.

Visible glyphs for control characters can be useful in plain text
editing/input and for filling out Unicode charts. But, if this is
messing things up for other applications, those glyphs could be
removed from Code2000.

Best regards,

James Kass
.

Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: U+3031 and on"
Previous message: Mark Davis: "Re: Proposed Update of UTS #10: Unicode Collation Algorithm"
Maybe in reply to: Jungshik Shin: "visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters"
Next in thread: Andrew C. West: "Re: visible glyphs for U+2062 and similar characters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 12 2003 - 17:43:14 EDT