RE: marks in Modern Hebrew, Yiddish

From: Peter_Constable@sil.org
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 09:57:42 EDT

Next message: mjabbar@bangla.net: "Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?"

Previous message: Stefan Persson: "Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?"
Maybe in reply to: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "marks in Modern Hebrew, Yiddish"
Next in thread: Roozbeh Pournader: "Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Dagesh, Shin/Sin, Holem, and all the vowels underneath will occur in
> modern Hebrew instructional materials, and similiarly in Yiddish
> instructional materials.

Mati made similar comments to Benson. (My current concern does not relate
to vowels.) Can it be said that dagesh is used more often than shin/sin
dots, or vice versa? (I'm guessing the answer is no.)

- Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485

Next message: mjabbar@bangla.net: "Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?"
Previous message: Stefan Persson: "Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?"
Maybe in reply to: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "marks in Modern Hebrew, Yiddish"
Next in thread: Roozbeh Pournader: "Re: Persian or Farsi? (was RE: Decimal separator with more than o ne c haracter?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 22 2003 - 11:04:48 EDT