From: Michael Everson (email@example.com)
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 13:58:52 EDT
At 12:18 -0400 2003-05-22, Edward C. D. Hopkins wrote:
>But toward being back on topic: it is not clear to me if the roadmap
>includes or rejects Arsacid Parthian/Parthian Aramaic (and other descriptive
>names have been used). Can someone knowledgeable on inclusion of this
>Aramaic variant script in Unicode enlighten me?
Not without detail. But if it's a variant of Aramaic, it is likely to
have been unified with Aramaic (which has not yet been encoded).
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 22 2003 - 14:54:30 EDT