Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 14:07:08 EDT

  • Next message: "RE: Persian or Farsi?"

    At 18:29 +0100 2003-05-22, Theodore H. Smith wrote:
    >>>It looked like "Old English" writing, but it could have been
    >>>called Ogham perhaps, or maybe my memory fails me.

    It must be.

    >But seriously, what is so special about the Gothic style that it
    >needs its own block?

    Both Fraktur for Mathematics and Wulfilan Gothic have been encoded.

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 22 2003 - 14:58:24 EDT