Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 19:51:34 EDT

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Maths letters and digits"

    At 23:00 +0200 2003-05-22, Philippe Verdy wrote:

    >There are clearly two paths to have new characters encoded with
    >Unicode: either by formal proposal by an independant group or vendor
    >that has enough influence to have Unicode map existing encodings to
    >codepoints, then Unicode prosing this new subset to ISO10646, or
    >using the ISO procedure which is much more bureaucratic, and where
    >national states and their standard authorities have a large
    >influence.

    This is NOT how it works.

    >The agreement between the bureaucratic ISO10646 and the independant
    >Unicode (which accepts proposal from influent provided that they
    >donate time and money) requires some part of bureaucracy for Unicode
    >members, and some oppenness from ISO to adapt to the market demand
    >given via Unicode.

    This is NOT how it works.

    >The question is then who represents the best the interest of a
    >communauty: a national standard organization working with ISO, or
    >groups of users asking for change to their software vendors that
    >work with Unicode, with less political decisions...

    This is NOT how it works.

    >Generally, searchers and linguists prefer to work with librarians
    >and with their national standard organization, so they tend to use
    >the more bureaucratic way via ISO10646, unless they have already
    >existing large databases of pulications for which they ask a
    >standard to Unicode to facilitate compatible interchanges...

    This is NOT how it works.

    >The case of independant groups of users (for example Klingon
    >supporters, or searchers studying an archaic or minor language which
    >only interests a poor country without public support from national
    >librarians) is difficult here: their work reaches an insufficient
    >audience to have marketability, so they get little or no support
    >from influent Unicode members. Also they are recognized by no
    >national standard organism and can't influence ISO10646. The
    >critical decision will come with support by publishers if these
    >users can get the money needed to finance their publication.

    This is NOT how it works.

    -- 
    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 22 2003 - 20:48:48 EDT