Re: Dutch IJ, again

From: Pim Blokland (
Date: Sat May 24 2003 - 13:11:20 EDT

  • Next message: "Re: PUA glyphs in fonts (was: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?)"

    Curtis Clark schreef:

    > In every other case, though, it would be an error,
    > which en-us MS Word would automatically correct. :-)

    The Dutch version of MS-Word doesn't understand about i+j either: it
    "corrects" IJver to Ijver.
    Presumably this was done to force us into using U+0133...

    Pim Bloikalnd

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 24 2003 - 13:52:51 EDT