Re: Dutch IJ, again

From: Karl Pentzlin (
Date: Mon May 26 2003 - 14:29:55 EDT

  • Next message: Pim Blokland: "Re: Dutch IJ, again"

    Am Montag, 26. Mai 2003 um 16:13 schrieb Pim Blokland:

    PB> Because there ARE words in Dutch where the combination i+j is not
    PB> the same as ? (e.g. "bijectie") ...

    In quality typography, does the "ij" in "bijectie" look different
    from an ij ligature?
    Is it recommended to write "bi[ZWNJ]jectie" when you don't use
    U+0133 for "common" "ij"s?
    - Karl

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 26 2003 - 15:08:59 EDT