From: Marco Cimarosti (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu May 29 2003 - 11:19:36 EDT
Brian Doyle wrote:
> on 5/29/03 9:15 AM, Marion Gunn at email@example.com wrote:
> > When a reference to using embryonic ISO 639-3 to
> > 'legitimize' SIL's flawed
> > Ethnologue is let pass with no comment....
> Why is Ethnologue flawed?
And how is this more on-topic on a mailing list called "Unicode List" than
discussing a banner offered by the _Unicode_ Consortium to flag web pages
encoded in _Unicode_?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 29 2003 - 11:58:43 EDT