From: Barry Caplan (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Jun 06 2003 - 13:14:46 EDT
Thanks Mark, but I had done all that online searching before I posted to the list. Is the book (which I no longer have a copy of) the only place where the details for conformance for 2.x are archived?
If so, is that a good idea?
At 11:09 AM 6/5/2003 -0700, Mark Davis wrote:
>If you start on http://www.unicode.org/ and click on Start Here,
>you'll get to a page about the Unicode Standard.
>In the left-hand column, clicking on Versions of the Unicode Standard
>will get you to http://www.unicode.org/standard/versions/.
>In the left-hand column you will see the different versions of the
>standards. Unicode 2.1.9 takes you to
>where you will find the major and minor references. If you look in the
>book, you'll find conformance is chapter 3.
>The Unicode Consortium. The Unicode Standard, Version 2.0
>Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley Developers Press, 1996. ISBN
>Clauses may be amended by:
>Moore, Lisa. Unicode Technical Report #8, The Unicode Standard,
>Version 2.1, Revision 2. Cupertino, CA, The Unicode Consortium, 1998.
>⭺ “Eppur si muove” ◄
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Barry Caplan" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:34
>Subject: conformance for unicode 2.x?
>> I was trying to find the place on unicode.org where conformance for
>2.x is defined. I think one of the 2.1.x updates referred back to
>earlier conformance specs, but I couldn't find them. Any pointers?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 06 2003 - 14:11:09 EDT