From: Mark Davis (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Jun 06 2003 - 14:54:53 EDT
We never put the 2.0 Standard online. We do, of course, keep copies in
our office, but your best bet is to borrow one from a collegue.
► “Eppur si muove” ◄
----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry Caplan" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Mark Davis" <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:14
Subject: Re: conformance for unicode 2.x?
> Thanks Mark, but I had done all that online searching before I
posted to the list. Is the book (which I no longer have a copy of) the
only place where the details for conformance for 2.x are archived?
> If so, is that a good idea?
> At 11:09 AM 6/5/2003 -0700, Mark Davis wrote:
> >If you start on http://www.unicode.org/ and click on Start Here,
> >you'll get to a page about the Unicode Standard.
> >In the left-hand column, clicking on Versions of the Unicode
> >will get you to http://www.unicode.org/standard/versions/.
> >In the left-hand column you will see the different versions of the
> >standards. Unicode 2.1.9 takes you to
> >where you will find the major and minor references. If you look in
> >book, you'll find conformance is chapter 3.
> >The Unicode Consortium. The Unicode Standard, Version 2.0
> >Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley Developers Press, 1996. ISBN
> >Clauses may be amended by:
> >Moore, Lisa. Unicode Technical Report #8, The Unicode Standard,
> >Version 2.1, Revision 2. Cupertino, CA, The Unicode Consortium,
> >âº â?oEppur si muoveâ? â-"
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Barry Caplan" <email@example.com>
> >To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> >Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:34
> >Subject: conformance for unicode 2.x?
> >> I was trying to find the place on unicode.org where conformance
> >2.x is defined. I think one of the 2.1.x updates referred back to
> >earlier conformance specs, but I couldn't find them. Any pointers?
> >> Thanks!
> >> Barry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 06 2003 - 15:53:59 EDT